Minnesota has a deadline to reduce poverty, and it’s only two years away. Nine years ago, a bipartisan legislative commission studied poverty in the state and set out an ambitious plan to eliminate it.

More than 533,000 Minnesotans live in households below the federal poverty threshold, and a new report cites major gaps in racial disparity. (Chris Bastian/Flickr)

But time is running short, and Anne Krisnik, who heads the Joint Religious Legislative Coalition, said by her group’s calculation, things aren’t looking good to meet that deadline – based on the three benchmarks set by the commission. “One was to reduce the poverty rates among racial minority groups to the national average by 2012, which we did not do,” she explained, “One was to reduce the poverty rates among children by half by 2014, which we did not do. And the third is to eliminate poverty by 2020.”

The coalition’s latest update, released this month, shows almost 13-percent of Minnesota children live in poverty and one in ten households is affected by hunger. The update also found huge gaps in racial disparity for families in poverty. Minnesotans of color are also about half as likely to own a home and significantly less likely to graduate from high school on time.

The median annual income for African-American Minnesotans is about $32,000, compared to more than$90,000 for whites. Brett Grant with the group Voices for Racial Justice said historic, institutional racism continues to be a problem in the state. “Minnesota is known across the nation to have, like, a wonderful education system, a wonderful healthcare system. But when you conduct a racial equity analysis it actually has some of the worst racial and economic disparities in the nation,” he stated.

There is some good news, however. In 2017, state foreclosure rates were the lowest in a decade. Graduation rates for homeless students have risen almost 10-percent, and the state’s minimum wage has increased.

Krisnik added that there are many different factors at work, and says it will take both public and private-sector commitments to help people recover because, “There isn’t one single way to address poverty. So, if you give someone a safe home, that’s very important, but if they don’t have a job or they don’t have a car to get to work, that’s a problem.”

Krisnik said the ultimate purpose of tracking these issues is to get Minnesotans talking about poverty, and asking how the state can do better to keep its pledge to end it.